Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Alan Cote's avatar

As the comment Robert Morris says, mechanical precession is unrelated to bearing rotation. That wiki link illustrates it nicely.

I credit Jobst Brandt posts on rec.bicycles.tech decades ago for my first understanding of precession. Brandt claimed that precession forces were so great that no amount of tightening, threadlock, etc would keep (backwards) pedals from loosening. That was surely speculative, as I can't imagine he measured precession force. It would seem to depend on the tolerance in a given pedal/crank threaded joint (which varies), applied load, # of cycles, etc. Your use of backwards cranks super tightened suggests that enough applied torque will work.

Pedal threading and precession are widely misunderstood in bicycle engineering. I was an engineering expert witness in a lawsuit in which an ill-designed pedal/adapter system from Bell Sports caused some horrific crashes when pedals unscrewed. Like the designer of those pedals the PhD ME experts for the defense also failed to understand precession. It's not good when injuries result from such misunderstanding.

I've looked for info (patents, period literature, etc) on the origins of pedal threading, including the mention you have of high-wheel bicycles -- but never found anything. If you have I'd love to see it.

Expand full comment
Robert Morris's avatar

For a nice illustration of this effect see:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precession_(mechanical)

The effect is due to rotating radial forces and has nothing to do with bearing friction.

Bob Morris

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts